La Plume ( The Pen that Writes)
Author, ghostwriter, journalist, and traveller. Looking for the next great writing adventure!
Sunday, March 19, 2017
Reedsy Review
Disclaimer- This post is based upon my opinions and experience. This is meant for informational purposes and is in no way connected to Reedsy.com.
A few months ago, a client asked me what I knew about Reedsy, a European based site that provides freelance writers and editors services for clients. They state that their freelancers are vetted and that they only provide services from top tiered providers.
So, I tried it out and put in my application- which essentially was material for my profile on Reedsy. The staff looked at it, asked some questions, and made some suggestions for changes. I then met with one of the owners via Skype and we had a lovely chat and I was in.
My profile went live on the site and I waited. Over the past two months I have received messages from two potential clients, and neither of them amounted to much, and in fact they just stopped responding.
The first potential client was not ready to write a book. They were waiting for funding and said maybe next year if they got funding they would be in touch- maybe.
The second potential buyer I felt was hunting for writers and editors for his own business.
There is a strict (but fair) rule about responding quickly to requests of potential clients, but I can say the same is not true of the clients. Clients can choose a number of potential providers at a time to talk to. One of things I did not like were clients wanting written samples of other ghostwritten pieces. Much of my work is already attached to my profile- which obviously they do not look at, and as a ghostwriter- most of my best work as a ghostwriter is under a NDA contract.
It seems that ghostwriting is a new addition to Reedsy, and so maybe they are still figuring out the process. They have now included a "contract" template that we are to use with clients. It seems to be better suited to editors and graphic artists which are the flagship for Reedsy.
I recently had another colleague that was wanting to find a content editor for her book. Reedsy is a good option for her to find a provider- and so I contacted them about their referral program. Their referral program is a $25 credit. I say credit- because it can only be used on Reedsy Marketplace.
One thing I do like is their process of paying. It is set up through a system called Stripe (think PayPal). Once the client is set up, it automatically withdraws money on specified days and pays me. I wish I could do this with every client I work with. The only drawback is that it is another system to have to sign up for and it is not American based.
Overall, I would say that for people looking for someone to edit, format or design work on their book, this is a great resource. I can only advertise for one service on their site. I cannot also sell editing services. For a ghostwriter, it needs some work and a better understanding of how ghostwriters work and maybe some tweaks such as vetting potential clients.
Hopefully, I will have some more positive updates in the future.
Friday, February 3, 2017
Authors- Watch Your Wallet!
I want to begin by saying, I am going to withhold names in this article in order to protect the guilty. I cannot stress enough that you should be very, very careful about "reputable" sites and companies offering you the moon, with bait and switch techniques that can really cost unwary authors thecash in their wallet.
I was recommended a company by a colleague I trust as a potential service provider I could work with. The first warning sign was that my colleague had never actually used their services- they just thought the guy was nice and his concept solid. So I put on my journalism pants, and decided to talk to the CEO of XYZ company.
Here is the break down of what they provide.
1. The claim to be a literary agent. They are not licensed and they don't actually perform the duties of a traditional literary agent.
2. They offer a "crowd funding" site for authors. The way it works is this- an author asks their friends and family to buy pre-sale copies of their upcoming book. If the number of books reaches a certain level, then the company "pitches" their book idea to a certain level of "publishers". (I know I am using a lot of quotes, but there is a lot of terms they use that are suspect and up to their interpretation). The author must create the query, synopsis and proposal on their own which they post on the site.
The bottom level are self publishing companies
Second - Hybrid publishers
Third- Small publishers
Fourth- A few traditional business book publishers
3. It is up to the author to bring in the buyers of the book. The idea is if the author has a certain number of pre-sales, then a publisher will be interested in signing with them.
4. They charge 30-35% commission on those pre-sales. Yes that is not a misprint. They are not a publisher or a printer. They just feel that the use of their site is worth a third of an author's pre-sales. This does not account for what the publisher is going to charge the author to publish and print the book. This is off the top.
5. They take a 15% commission if the book is published. This was confusing because they said they did this in an early interview and then recanted this statement later.
6. None of the information I have provided so far is on their website. They want the author to pitch their book and then they make the offer.
7. They claim to work with high end publishers, but when asked which of their clients were picked up by those publishers, they would not respond.
8. They claim that a number of best selling authors have dumped their previous publishers to use their platform. When they say best seller- they mean Amazon Bestseller. There were a couple of authors that had been previously published, but as of this article, they either had not met their quota, or they were not picked up by a new publisher and had less than 200 presales. This is problematic for me as most publishers would have a 'first right to refuse' clause in their contract. The one conclusion I came to was that their previous sales did not warrant a new contract, or they were not interested in their new book.
Facts
- Agents usually only charge 15% on royalties.
- Established Crowd Funding sites such as Indiegogo and Kickstarter only charge 5-8% commission, and nothing thereafter.
I had further concerns about the companies offerings:
1. A number of the "small" presses are actually well documented vanity presses. Their response?
"Yes,
we have vanity publishers on the site as options but that doesn't mean we
suggest authors use them."
I could stop my article right here with that quote.
2. Why are they located in Asia and marketing to US market with US publishers?
3. In one of the campaigns to sell books I noticed that they were actually selling coaching packages and even a workshop in South America for $2400 (they counted that as 20 books). The way they stated they dealt with the money was that they gave it to the publisher for the pre-sales, or if the author decided to self publish, they would give them the difference minus their commission. I asked exactly how they were paying the authors for coaching packages, which they were counting as books and there was no response. I guess I could bake my readers a cake and call it 10 books worth of presales. Yeah, my cheesecake is that good!
4. Why are they charging twice what a literary agent would charge. Their response was, "...there
is more value for authors because they take home more on a publishing deal through
us." Not sure how that is true.
5. I asked them why they charged 6 times more than what Indiegogo and Kickstarter charge. Their response was, "If
authors don't want a publisher, they go use Kickstarter to raise funds." Again not close to true.
Conclusion
As a writer and ghostwriter, I get offers from companies constantly touting a book in a weekend, or a book in a tupperware bin, or just give us your IP and we will make you a best seller at 2:00 AM in the Turkish Language classics category on Amazon.
I tell my clients, and now you my readers the same thing. Books are hard to write. They are even harder to get published no matter how you choose to do it. There is no short cut to success. There is no best seller formula except what I already stated- hard work. Throw in frustration, rejection, rewriting, rejection, lather, rinse repeat.
There are legitimate companies that are assisting authors along the way. They are wonderful and help people realize their dreams. My advice is to ask questions. Tons of questions. If it does not feel right cut bait. If they cannot give you verifiable answers- thank them and leave. If they cannot give you real people that have had success with them to talk to, then keep looking.
I will offer ANYONE reading this- if you have questions about a company- email me, and we can talk about it. If I don't have an answer I will work to find it. I will do this for free for you. I want people with great book ideas to have a chance to change the world of as many people as they can reach, without someone reaching in their pocket and stripping their wallet.
Thursday, January 12, 2017
Using Quirks to Reveal Personality - Guest Post(Becca Puglisi)-
I’ve spent a lot of my writing career thinking about characters.
Which ones do I vividly remember? What makes them so unforgettable?
One of the common denominators is that they all have at least one
attribute that 1) I admire, or 2) draws me to them in some way. As a shy
teenager, I fell in love with Anne Shirley’s vivaciousness—clearly expressed
through her nonstop chatter. Every Christmas, I watch Elf and laugh my
mistletoe off at Buddy’s socially awkward brand of innocence.
The key, I think, is to give our characters a quality that is
admirable, likable, or somehow inspires empathy. Then we’ve got to show that
positive attribute in a way that cements it in readers’ brains and leaves no
doubt as to why they’re drawn to the hero. One easy way to do this is through
the use of quirks—small, original mannerisms or habits that are unique to a
character. While these are often randomly applied as a way of making a
character offbeat or “quirky”, I’d like to focus today on how to utilize quirks
deliberately as a way of showing your character’s positive attributes. Here are
some quick steps on how to do this effectively.
Identify your character’s primary attribute. Maybe
it’s a trait that will help him achieve his goal. Perhaps it’s one that matches
his morals and values. Likely,
it’s going to be one that drives his choices. Regardless of what you
decide, his primary attribute needs to make sense in light of his history. His
upbringing, core beliefs, profound past events—all of these things should play
a part in determining who he is in the current story, so take them into
consideration when choosing his stand-out trait.
Brainstorm actions that exemplify that trait. If
your character is meticulous, what are some realistic mannerisms that she might
acquire? Maybe she would obsessively clean (Monica Geller, Friends). She
might count her toothbrush strokes and steps to the bus stop (Harold Crick, Stranger
than Fiction). Perhaps she would make fastidious notes on post-its and
stick them to every surface in her apartment (Dr. Emma Russell,The Saint).
The cool thing about choosing a quirk is that the possibilities are virtually
limitless. You just have to find one that fits with your character’s whole
personality. Take note of her flaws, fears, and other issues, and make sure
that her quirk fits her.
Use your quirk to show the attribute. Plenty has
been said about the value of showing instead of telling in our writing. It’s
the difference between someone saying that your new roommate is a little
strange and you figuring it for yourself when you find her talking to her
extensive ceramic bunny collection. When someone tells you something about
another person, you hear the information, but it’s impersonal—until you witness
it for yourself. Then you experience an emotional response. This emotion is
what you want to evoke in readers, so instead of stating outright what kind of
person your character is, show it through the use of a well-chosen quirk.
Use quirks sparingly. As with any other gesture or
habit, quirks that are used too often become distracting. Choose fitting times
for your character to show his personality so each instance has meaning and
serves a purpose.
To wrap things up, I’d like to close with two examples of how
quirks have been used to convey character personality. The first is an example
of how not to do it.
A few years ago, I was a fan of the short-lived TV show Revolution—despite
the main character. Charlie cried in every episode. It got so bad that my
husband and I started betting on time slots to see when she would overflow.
This mannerism of hers was completely overdone, and worse, it didn’t tell me
anything about her personality. The writers must have gotten my memo because in
season two, the waterworks were gone. The sudden departure shows that the
constant crying wasn’t a true indicator of her personality anyway. This is a
good example of a quirk that didn’t make sense for the character and was used haphazardly,
without purpose.
On the other hand, the first time we meet Hermione Granger, she
starts off her mostly one-sided conversation with Ron and Harry by informing
them that she’s learned all the course books by heart and that all the spells
she’s practiced have worked perfectly. Her bragging is a quirk that she
exhibits fairly consistently; it’s a sign of both her intelligence and
competitiveness but also of her insecurity. As the books progress, her bragging
progressively lessens and eventually disappears—a sign that she has
successfully navigated her character arc and no longer needs to prove herself.
This is a great example of an effective use of a quirk to show a character’s
personality. It also proves that quirks can be used to show not only positive
attributes, but flaws, too.
For a handy tool to help organize each of your character’s
quirks, positive and negative traits, habits and mannerisms, and other
qualities, check out the Character-At-A-Glance resource at One Stop For
Writers. You can find this and other helpful tools on the
Templates and Worksheets page.
So many factors are involved in the making of our characters. While it's important to know the details about their pasts, sometimes a simple snapshot can provide a lot of insight. Use this spreadsheet to create an overall glimpse of the important characters in your story. You can then easily see if your characters need more variety, add conflict by introducing opposing qualities, encourage cooperation by adding harmonious elements, or even determine if a character is extraneous and should be cut from the story.
What do you think? What character quirks have you seen or read
that were effective in conveying personality?
Becca Puglisi is an international speaker, writing coach, and bestselling author of The Emotion Thesaurus and its sequels. Her books are available in five languages, are sourced by US universities, and are used by novelists, screenwriters, editors, and psychologists around the world. She is passionate about learning and sharing her knowledge with others through her Writers Helping Writers blog and via One Stop For Writers—a powerhouse online library created to help writers elevate their storytelling. You can find Becca online at both of these spots, as well as on Facebook and Twitter.
Wednesday, January 4, 2017
Ghostwriting Versus Collaborative Writing
Working with another writer on any project can be challenging. Both ghostwriting and collaborative ( co-authoring) have similar challenges in that they both require the writers to see eye to eye and be able work well together.
Ghostwriting- Write in another person's voice. They provide a manuscript based upon an author's writing, resource material and often heavily upon interviewing. The ghostwriter seeks to capture and match the author's voice.
Collaborative Writing- Tow or more authors work together as partners to create a book or even a script. They often chose different aspects of what each writer is responsible for. There is a unified vision and voice that is achieved.
Be mindful and decide early on each other's roles, boundaries, and outcome from working together. If you cannot agree on these points early in the process, it will fall apart later. It is not easy to ghostwrite or be a collaborative writer, it is a nightmare if your partner and you cannot work as a well oiled machine.
Tuesday, January 3, 2017
Just be you- Everyone else sucks...
Authenticity is key to all that we do as writers and in our writing. People know when we are bullshitting, so why do we do it?
Authenticity is a word that is not always understood and is often misused. We should always be true to who we are, because frankly that is the only person you can be. Unless you are Batman, then just be Batman.
We risk coming off as fake, or inauthentic when we attempt to be something we are not. I see people do this in the speaking industry all the time. They talk on subjects they are not experts in. Worse- they write books about it.
Writing a book does NOT make you an expert. That is being inauthentic, although I hear that comment all the time.
"Write a book and be an expert in your field."
Uh- you either are already and expert or you ain't. Writing a book does not MAKE you anything but an author. Being a good or bad author could be up to debate, but it does not make you an expert. I feel I am repeating myself.
A common challenge I have with authors is the following. These are ways NOT to be authentic:
1. Use someone else's ideas and claim them to be their own.
2. Use someone else's ideas and change the words around.
3. Quote other people A LOT.
4. Quizzes with claiming to determine a person's ( fill in the blank) type.
5. Assessments that are never tried on real living people.
6. Talking about neuroscience, when you have a degree in business.
7. Using White Label materials (these are other people's writing you BUY and use as your own. We will talk more about that in later posts).
I could go on, but you get the point right? Write what you know- the cardinal rule of writing. Why do people forget this and write what they think is the next New York Times Bestseller. If you want a New York Times Bestseller write about two zombies who are into Bondage. Fifty Shades of The Living Dead. (You watch- someone is going to write that book now).
I am who I am. Like me. Hate me. Laugh at me. I am over it. I was a guy that looked like a football player growing up that liked musical theater and played the flute. I got over people's opinions of me a long time ago, and I have been happier and honestly MORE successful because of it.
Just be you. Everyone else sucks!
Monday, January 2, 2017
Year of the Ghostwriter
This picture is pretty much what my desk looks like.
Ha ha ha- not even close. I can't find my glasses, my pen is forever misplaced, books are tumbling and the are mountains of papers.
I live in the world of crawling around in other people's minds, grabbing their ideas and translating them to words on a page. I help people who want to write and publish a book become a part of the 2% who actually achieve this amazing feat.
In 2017, I have deemed it the year of the ghostwriter. I am taking my skills to the next level and am translating them through teaching and public speaking.
In addition, I am adding a daily video and blog post. My concept is to connect to writers and those who are looking for help writing through words, images and writing. Each video will have a blog post that accompanies it. The hope is that I will connect to people's unique learning styles.
Let's look at the weekly breakdown:
Mondays- Weekend Recap and Publishing Trends
Tuesdays- Business Concepts in Writing
Wednesdays- Collaborative Writing Lab (Ghostwriting Skills)
Thursdays- Publishing Tips
Fridays- Writing for Profit
I encourage everyone and listening to participate. Ask questions. Make Comments. Heck guest blog or be interviewed!
Let's make 2017 the year of not only the ghostwriter, but the year YOU get published.
Monday, October 10, 2016
La Plume ( The Pen that Writes): Rules of a Poetry Reading
La Plume ( The Pen that Writes): Rules of a Poetry Reading: I have been trying out this new thing- Poetry Readings. Well it is new to me, and I have had two simultaneous experiences- a respect and awe...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)